| Peer-Reviewed

Traditional Supply Chain VS. Cold Chain: Contribution in Global Carbon Emissions

Received: 13 August 2017     Accepted: 30 August 2017     Published: 11 October 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Since last couple of decades, the discussion is going on traditional supply chain and cold supply chain. The key difference between both supply chains is the product or materials sensitivity. Usually, cold supply chain used for fragile items/products such as meat, milk, ice cream, tablets, medicine and medical instruments. Undeniably, cold supply chain carry a risk of product expiry due to unsuitable temperature. This research distinguish the difference between traditional supply chain and cold chain in detailed. Researchers used literature reviews method to sum-up the key findings and differences between these supply chains. In the cold supply chain, packaging part is also very costly in terms of delivery to avoid damage, protect from the temperature changes and special handling. As well special packaging increases the cost of storage and limits transportation capacity. On the other hand, modern material handling, the overall operational cost of cold chain warehouses is higher as compare to the normal/regular warehouses. And in the cold environments, electrical devices may lose their functionality. While reliability design in the cold temperatures; reduces the better life by 40 to 50%.

Published in American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11
Page(s) 97-103
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cold Chain, Global Carbon Emissions, Packaging, Traditional Supply Chain

References
[1] Antle, J. M. (1999). Benefits and costs of food safety regulation. Food Policy, 24(6), 605-623.
[2] Soysal, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Meuwissen, M. P. M., & Van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2012). A Review on Quantitative Models for Sustainable Food Logistics Management. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 3(2), 136-155.
[3] Assi, T.-M., Brown, S. T., Djibo, A., Norman, B. A., Rajgopal, J., Welling, J. S., Lee, B. Y. (2011). Impact of changing the measles vaccine vial size on Niger’s vaccine supply chain: a computational model. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 425.
[4] Bozorgi, A., Pazour, J., & Nazzal, D. (2014). A New Inventory Model for Cold Items that Considers costs and Emissions. International Journal of Production Economics.
[5] Denholm, P., & KUlcinski, G. L. (2004). Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage systems. Energey Conversion and Management, 45(13-14), 2153-2172.
[6] Doherty, K. (2011). Green Giant: Walmart Canada opens up the largest sustainable refrigerated food distribution center in canada. Food Logistics.
[7] Garnett, T. (2007). Food refrigeration: What is the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and how might emissions be reduced. Food Climate Research Network, University of Surrey.
[8] Garnett, T. (2011). Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy, 36, Supplement 1, S23-S32.
[9] Guo, H., & Shao, M. (2012). Process Reengineering of Cold Chain Logistics of Agricultural Products based on Low-carbon Economy, 04(02), 59-62.
[10] Guru, M. V., & Horne, J. E. (1999). Labeling of GMO’s: Impact on Consumer Demand and Global Food Trade. Nature Biotechnology, 17, 43-43.
[11] Ingwersen, W. W. (2012). Life Cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 152-163.
[12] James, S. J., & James, C. (2010). The food cold-chain and climate change. Food Research International, 43(7), 1944-1956.
[13] Kelepouris, t., Pramatari, K., & Doukidis, G. (2007). RFID-enabled traceability in the food supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(2), 183-200.
[14] Lee, B. Y., Norman, B. A., Assi, T.-M., Chen, S.-I., Bailey, R. R., Rajgopal, J., Burke, D. S. (2010). Single versus multi-dose vaccine vials: An economic computational model. Vaccine, 28(32), 5292-5300.
[15] Kim, H., Jeong, H., & Park, H. (2012). A study on RFID/USN based e-pedigree system for cold chain management. In Technology Management Conference (ITMC), 2012 IEEE International (PP. 137-143).
[16] Patterson, D. (2002). A simple way to estimate the cost of downtime. In proceedings of the 16th USENIX Conference on System Administration (PP. 185-188). Bekerley, CA, USA: USENIX Association.
[17] Manzini, R., & Accorsi, R. (2013). The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. Journal of Food Engineering, 115(2), 251-263.
[18] Prakash, G., Renold, A. P., & Venkatalakshmi, B. (2012). RFID based Mobile Cold Chain Management System for Warehousing. Procedia Engineering, 38, 964-969.
[19] Rosenthal, E. (April 26, 2008). Environmental Cost of Shipping Groceries Around the World. The Net York Times.
[20] Putri, E. A., Dowaki, K., Yudoko, G., & Koido, K. (2012). Comparison of Environment Impact between Conventional and Cold Chain Management System in Paprika Distribution Process. The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM), 5(1).
[21] Singh, R. K., & Singh, N. (2005). 3- Quality of packaged foods. In J. H. Han (Ed.), Innovations in Food Packaging (PP. 24-44). London: Academic Press.
[22] Tegene, A., Huffman, W. E., Rousu, M. C., & Shogren, J. (2013). The effects of Information on Consumer Demand for Biotech Foods: Evidence From Experimental Auctions (Technical Bulletins No. 33577). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
[23] Abdul, S., Khan, R., Qianli, D., & Zhang, Y. (n.d.). The Impact of Sustainable Supply Chain on Enterprise Performance : In the Perspective of China, (1984).
[24] Khan, S. A. R., Dong, Q. L., & Yu, Z. (2016). Research on the Measuring Performance of Green Supply Chain Management: In the Perspective of China. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 27, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.27.167
[25] Khan, S. A. R., & Qianli, D. (2017). Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9172-5
[26] Khan, S. A. R., Qianli, D., Song Bo, W., Zaman, K., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Environmental logistics performance indicators affecting per capita income and sectoral growth: evidence from a panel of selected global ranked logistics countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(2), 1518–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7916
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, Dong Qianli, Yu Zhang. (2017). Traditional Supply Chain VS. Cold Chain: Contribution in Global Carbon Emissions. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2(6), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Syed Abdul Rehman Khan; Dong Qianli; Yu Zhang. Traditional Supply Chain VS. Cold Chain: Contribution in Global Carbon Emissions. Am. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2017, 2(6), 97-103. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, Dong Qianli, Yu Zhang. Traditional Supply Chain VS. Cold Chain: Contribution in Global Carbon Emissions. Am J Traffic Transp Eng. 2017;2(6):97-103. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11,
      author = {Syed Abdul Rehman Khan and Dong Qianli and Yu Zhang},
      title = {Traditional Supply Chain VS. Cold Chain: Contribution in Global Carbon Emissions},
      journal = {American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering},
      volume = {2},
      number = {6},
      pages = {97-103},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtte.20170206.11},
      abstract = {Since last couple of decades, the discussion is going on traditional supply chain and cold supply chain. The key difference between both supply chains is the product or materials sensitivity. Usually, cold supply chain used for fragile items/products such as meat, milk, ice cream, tablets, medicine and medical instruments. Undeniably, cold supply chain carry a risk of product expiry due to unsuitable temperature. This research distinguish the difference between traditional supply chain and cold chain in detailed. Researchers used literature reviews method to sum-up the key findings and differences between these supply chains. In the cold supply chain, packaging part is also very costly in terms of delivery to avoid damage, protect from the temperature changes and special handling. As well special packaging increases the cost of storage and limits transportation capacity. On the other hand, modern material handling, the overall operational cost of cold chain warehouses is higher as compare to the normal/regular warehouses. And in the cold environments, electrical devices may lose their functionality. While reliability design in the cold temperatures; reduces the better life by 40 to 50%.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Traditional Supply Chain VS. Cold Chain: Contribution in Global Carbon Emissions
    AU  - Syed Abdul Rehman Khan
    AU  - Dong Qianli
    AU  - Yu Zhang
    Y1  - 2017/10/11
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11
    T2  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
    SP  - 97
    EP  - 103
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8604
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20170206.11
    AB  - Since last couple of decades, the discussion is going on traditional supply chain and cold supply chain. The key difference between both supply chains is the product or materials sensitivity. Usually, cold supply chain used for fragile items/products such as meat, milk, ice cream, tablets, medicine and medical instruments. Undeniably, cold supply chain carry a risk of product expiry due to unsuitable temperature. This research distinguish the difference between traditional supply chain and cold chain in detailed. Researchers used literature reviews method to sum-up the key findings and differences between these supply chains. In the cold supply chain, packaging part is also very costly in terms of delivery to avoid damage, protect from the temperature changes and special handling. As well special packaging increases the cost of storage and limits transportation capacity. On the other hand, modern material handling, the overall operational cost of cold chain warehouses is higher as compare to the normal/regular warehouses. And in the cold environments, electrical devices may lose their functionality. While reliability design in the cold temperatures; reduces the better life by 40 to 50%.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

  • School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

  • School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

  • Sections