Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia

Nibo Beneberu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia

Nibo Beneberu

Published in Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 11, Issue 3)

Received: 9 August 2023 Accepted: 25 August 2023 Published: 8 September 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Crossbreeding had been initiated and put into practice in various parts of Ethiopia for a very long time to improve milk yield performance. This review was conducted to review and generating compiled information on milk production traits such as daily milk yield (DMY), lactation length (LL), and lactation milk yield of cross breed dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Review results of milk production performances in Ethiopia varied greatly from one genotype to another. The on-station lactation milk yield, lactation length and daily milk yield were ranged from 1293.01±23.70 to 2957.46±72.98 liters, 298.68±5.17 to 374.05±7.24 days, 4.18±5 to 8.70±0.17 liters, respectively, whereas the on-farm review results were ranged from 631.69±222.98 to 2705.43 liters, 241.65±26.22 to 310.91±41.83 days and 7.30±0.16 to 9.91 liters, respectively. Among the genotypes, the 50% F1 and 75% Holstein Friesian first generations were considered suitable for milk production parameters. The on-station development of 50% F2, F3, and 75% second generations showed low milk production. Regardless of blood level and genotype difference, the performance of on-farm crossbred cows was almost similar to on-station experimental cows. Crossbred cows were affected by non-genetic factors like year, season, and parity, depending on the breed and study location. In general, crossbred cows have good milk yield performances compared to indigenous (local) breeds. However, crossbred animals could not exploit their maximum potentials because animals are subjected to different environmental effects.

Published in	Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
Page(s)	37-41
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Crossbred, Daily Milk Yield, Genotype, Lactation Length, Lactation Milk Yield, Milk Performance, Milk Production Traits

References

[1]	CSA (Central Statistical Agency) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. 2020/2021. Agricultural Sample Survey Report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[2]	Hunduma Dinka. 2013. Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows under smallholder condition in Ethiopia. African Journal of Dairy Farming and Milk Production (AJDFMP) 1: 101-103.
[3]	Fikre Lobago, Merga Bekana, Hans Gustafsson and Hans Kindahl. 2007. Longitudinal observation on reproductive and lactation performances of smallholder crossbred dairy cattle in Fitche, Oromia region, central Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39: 395-403.
[4]	Arbel, R., Bigun, Y., Ezra, E., Sturman, H. &Hojean, D. 2001. The effect of extended calving intervals in high lactating cows on milk production and profitability. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 600–608.
[5]	Zewudu Wondifraw, B. M., Thombre and D. V., Bainwad. 2013. Effect of non-genetic factors on milk production of Holstein Friesian × Deoni crossbred cows. International Journal of Livestock Production, 4 (7): 106-112.
[6]	Dessalegn Genzebu, Berhan Tamir and Gebreyohanes Berhane. 2016. Study of reproductive and production performance of cross breed dairy cattle under smallholder’s management system in Bishoftu and Akaki Towns. Global Journal of Animal Science, Livestock Production and Animal Breeding. Vol. 4 (1), pp. 243-247.
[7]	Kefale Getahun. 2018. Genetic and Non-genetic Parameter Estimation for Productive and Reproductive Performances of Crossbred Dairy Cattle at Holetta Research Center. MSc Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. 109 Pp.
[8]	Haile Aynalem, B. K., Joshi, Workneh Ayalew, Azage Tegegne and A., Singh. 2009. Genetic evaluation of Ethiopian Borena cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian in central Ethiopia: milk production traits. Animal, 3 (4): 486 - 493.
[9]	Melku Muluye. 2016. Milk Production and Reproduction Performance of Local and Crossbreed Dairy Cows in Selected Districts of West Gojam Zone, Amhara Region. M. Sc. Thesis, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. 149 Pp.
[10]	Million Tadesse and Tadelle Dessie. 2003. Milk production performance of Zebu, Friesian and their crosses in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, (15) 3.
[11]	Tadesse Birhanu. 2014. Estimation of Crossbreeding Parameters in Holstein Friesian and Ethiopian Boran Crosses for Milk Production and Reproduction Traits at Holeta Agricultural Research Center. MSc Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. 83 Pp.
[12]	Gebregziabher Gebreyohannes, SkornKoonawootrittriron, Mauricio, A., Elzo and Thanathip Suwanasopee. 2013. Variance components and genetic parameters for milk production and lactation pattern in an Ethiopian multi-bred dairy cattle population. Asian Australas journal of Animal Science, 26 (9): 1237 - 1246.
[13]	Demeke Sindros, Neser, F. W. C. and Schoeman, S. J. 2004. Estimates of genetic parameters for Borena, Friesian and crosses of Friesian and Jersey with the Borena cattle in the tropical highlands of Ethiopia: milk production traits and cow weight. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 121: 163 - 175.
[14]	Kefena Effa, Tesfaye Kumsa and Yohannis Gojjam. 2006. Review of the performance of crossbred dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Pp191-199. In: Tamrat Degefa and Fekede Feyissa (Eds), Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, 5–7 September 2006. ESAP (Ethiopian Society of Animal Production), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[15]	Gebregziabher Gebreyohannes, SkornKoonawootrittriron, Mauricio Aguirre Elzo and Thanathip Suwanasopee. 2014. Genotype by Environment interaction effect on lactation pattern and milk production traits in an Ethiopian Dairy cattle population. Kasetsart Journal of Natural Science, 48: 38 - 51.
[16]	Sena Tadesse, Guesh fesaha, Adugnaw Abebe, Beletech Hailu and Workalem Dejen. 2014. Assessment of Productive and Reproductive Performances of Cross Breed Dairy cows in Debre tabor town. 4: 112-116.
[17]	Wondossen, A., Mohammed, A., & Negussie, E. 2018. Reproductive performance of Holstein Friesian dairy cows in a tropical highland environment. Journal of Advances in Dairy Research, 6 (2), 203.
[18]	Sisay Eshetu. 2015. Productive and Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cows (Horro, Horro X Friesian and Horro X Jersey) at Bako Agricultural Research Center. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[19]	Belay Duguma, Yisehak Kechero and G. P. J. Janssens. 2012. Productive and Reproductive Performance of Zebu X Holstein-Friesian Crossbred Dairy Cows in Jimma Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 8 (1): 67-72.
[20]	Wubshet Kassa. 2018. Estimation of Genetic and Non-Genetic Parameters for Reproduction and Production Traits of Holstein Friesian Dairy Herd at ELFORA Cheffa Dairy Farm, Oromia Zone of Amhara Region. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. 93 Pp.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nibo Beneberu. (2023). Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering, 11(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nibo Beneberu. Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia. Adv. BioSci. Bioeng. 2023, 11(3), 37-41. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nibo Beneberu. Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia. Adv BioSci Bioeng. 2023;11(3):37-41. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11,
  author = {Nibo Beneberu},
  title = {Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia},
  journal = {Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering},
  volume = {11},
  number = {3},
  pages = {37-41},
  doi = {10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.abb.20231103.11},
  abstract = {Crossbreeding had been initiated and put into practice in various parts of Ethiopia for a very long time to improve milk yield performance. This review was conducted to review and generating compiled information on milk production traits such as daily milk yield (DMY), lactation length (LL), and lactation milk yield of cross breed dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Review results of milk production performances in Ethiopia varied greatly from one genotype to another. The on-station lactation milk yield, lactation length and daily milk yield were ranged from 1293.01±23.70 to 2957.46±72.98 liters, 298.68±5.17 to 374.05±7.24 days, 4.18±5 to 8.70±0.17 liters, respectively, whereas the on-farm review results were ranged from 631.69±222.98 to 2705.43 liters, 241.65±26.22 to 310.91±41.83 days and 7.30±0.16 to 9.91 liters, respectively. Among the genotypes, the 50% F1 and 75% Holstein Friesian first generations were considered suitable for milk production parameters. The on-station development of 50% F2, F3, and 75% second generations showed low milk production. Regardless of blood level and genotype difference, the performance of on-farm crossbred cows was almost similar to on-station experimental cows. Crossbred cows were affected by non-genetic factors like year, season, and parity, depending on the breed and study location. In general, crossbred cows have good milk yield performances compared to indigenous (local) breeds. However, crossbred animals could not exploit their maximum potentials because animals are subjected to different environmental effects.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia
AU  - Nibo Beneberu
Y1  - 2023/09/08
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
T2  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
JF  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
JO  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
SP  - 37
EP  - 41
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-4162
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
AB  - Crossbreeding had been initiated and put into practice in various parts of Ethiopia for a very long time to improve milk yield performance. This review was conducted to review and generating compiled information on milk production traits such as daily milk yield (DMY), lactation length (LL), and lactation milk yield of cross breed dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Review results of milk production performances in Ethiopia varied greatly from one genotype to another. The on-station lactation milk yield, lactation length and daily milk yield were ranged from 1293.01±23.70 to 2957.46±72.98 liters, 298.68±5.17 to 374.05±7.24 days, 4.18±5 to 8.70±0.17 liters, respectively, whereas the on-farm review results were ranged from 631.69±222.98 to 2705.43 liters, 241.65±26.22 to 310.91±41.83 days and 7.30±0.16 to 9.91 liters, respectively. Among the genotypes, the 50% F1 and 75% Holstein Friesian first generations were considered suitable for milk production parameters. The on-station development of 50% F2, F3, and 75% second generations showed low milk production. Regardless of blood level and genotype difference, the performance of on-farm crossbred cows was almost similar to on-station experimental cows. Crossbred cows were affected by non-genetic factors like year, season, and parity, depending on the breed and study location. In general, crossbred cows have good milk yield performances compared to indigenous (local) breeds. However, crossbred animals could not exploit their maximum potentials because animals are subjected to different environmental effects.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Nibo Beneberu

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nibo Beneberu. (2023). Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering, 11(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nibo Beneberu. Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia. Adv. BioSci. Bioeng. 2023, 11(3), 37-41. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nibo Beneberu. Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia. Adv BioSci Bioeng. 2023;11(3):37-41. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11,
  author = {Nibo Beneberu},
  title = {Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia},
  journal = {Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering},
  volume = {11},
  number = {3},
  pages = {37-41},
  doi = {10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.abb.20231103.11},
  abstract = {Crossbreeding had been initiated and put into practice in various parts of Ethiopia for a very long time to improve milk yield performance. This review was conducted to review and generating compiled information on milk production traits such as daily milk yield (DMY), lactation length (LL), and lactation milk yield of cross breed dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Review results of milk production performances in Ethiopia varied greatly from one genotype to another. The on-station lactation milk yield, lactation length and daily milk yield were ranged from 1293.01±23.70 to 2957.46±72.98 liters, 298.68±5.17 to 374.05±7.24 days, 4.18±5 to 8.70±0.17 liters, respectively, whereas the on-farm review results were ranged from 631.69±222.98 to 2705.43 liters, 241.65±26.22 to 310.91±41.83 days and 7.30±0.16 to 9.91 liters, respectively. Among the genotypes, the 50% F1 and 75% Holstein Friesian first generations were considered suitable for milk production parameters. The on-station development of 50% F2, F3, and 75% second generations showed low milk production. Regardless of blood level and genotype difference, the performance of on-farm crossbred cows was almost similar to on-station experimental cows. Crossbred cows were affected by non-genetic factors like year, season, and parity, depending on the breed and study location. In general, crossbred cows have good milk yield performances compared to indigenous (local) breeds. However, crossbred animals could not exploit their maximum potentials because animals are subjected to different environmental effects.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review on Milk Yield Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Ethiopia
AU  - Nibo Beneberu
Y1  - 2023/09/08
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
T2  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
JF  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
JO  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
SP  - 37
EP  - 41
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-4162
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.11
AB  - Crossbreeding had been initiated and put into practice in various parts of Ethiopia for a very long time to improve milk yield performance. This review was conducted to review and generating compiled information on milk production traits such as daily milk yield (DMY), lactation length (LL), and lactation milk yield of cross breed dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Review results of milk production performances in Ethiopia varied greatly from one genotype to another. The on-station lactation milk yield, lactation length and daily milk yield were ranged from 1293.01±23.70 to 2957.46±72.98 liters, 298.68±5.17 to 374.05±7.24 days, 4.18±5 to 8.70±0.17 liters, respectively, whereas the on-farm review results were ranged from 631.69±222.98 to 2705.43 liters, 241.65±26.22 to 310.91±41.83 days and 7.30±0.16 to 9.91 liters, respectively. Among the genotypes, the 50% F1 and 75% Holstein Friesian first generations were considered suitable for milk production parameters. The on-station development of 50% F2, F3, and 75% second generations showed low milk production. Regardless of blood level and genotype difference, the performance of on-farm crossbred cows was almost similar to on-station experimental cows. Crossbred cows were affected by non-genetic factors like year, season, and parity, depending on the breed and study location. In general, crossbred cows have good milk yield performances compared to indigenous (local) breeds. However, crossbred animals could not exploit their maximum potentials because animals are subjected to different environmental effects.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download