In radiation protection of patients and medical exposure control, the Radcal 3036 dosimeter is the standard device used for radiodiagnostic dosimetry in medical field. However, for various reasons, this device is not always available, resulting in service interruptions. This led us to assess the effectiveness of ThermoLuminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) for the same service. This study consists in setting an appropriate protocol, then comparing the surface doses measured by the dosimeter Radcal 3036 and those measured with TLDs. We selected three radiological departments in Antananarivo. For the four standard examinations selected (thorax, skull, abdomen and pelvis), the results show that the differences between the values measured by the two dosimeters remain below to 5%. These results confirm that TLDs offer a credible alternative for measuring the dose received by the patient during medical radiological examination. Dosimetric monitoring breakup can then be avoided, to the benefit of the safety of the public and patients.
Published in | Radiation Science and Technology (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12 |
Page(s) | 5-10 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Thermoluminescents Dosimeter, Diagnostic Radiology, Patient, Dosimetry
[1] | IAEA, the safe use of radiation source, Vienna 1995 N°6. |
[2] | AIEA, Cours post-universitaire de Radioprotection, Vienne, 1995 N°5. |
[3] | AIEA, Cours Régional Supérieur de Formation sur la Sûreté Radiologique Et le Control des Sources de Rayonnements Ionisants, Vienne Autriche. |
[4] | AIEA, Cours Régional sur l’autorisation Et Inspection des Sources Rayonnement en Radiothérapie, Mai 2006, Autriche. |
[5] | AIEA, Normes fondamentales de protection contre les rayonnements ionisants et de sûreté des sources de rayonnements, 1997, Vienne. |
[6] | INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, Recommendation of ICRP, Publication 60, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York, 1996. |
[7] | CIPR, protection et sûreté radiologique, publication 73, paris. |
[8] | ALBER LISBONA, control de qualité en radiologie, 2003, Montpellier. |
[9] | ALBERLISBONA, Dosimétrie des explorations diagnostique radiologie, 2003, Montpellier. |
[10] | BEAUVAIS, MARCH, Exposition des Patients en Radiodiagnostic, Paris 2003. |
[11] | MONTAGNE, Imagerie Médicale, Tome 1 deuxième Edition, France 2001. |
[12] | Said SOUDJAY, mémoire de DEA, évaluation de la performance des dosimètres thermoluminescents pour la dosimétrie du patient en radiologie, janvier 2007. |
[13] | TLD equipment and materials, Thermoluminescence Dosimetry, THE HARSHAW Chemical Company. |
[14] | RAZAFINDRABE Rija lalaina, Mémoire de DEA, Etalonnage des Dosimètres Thermoluminescents utilisées en Radioprotection, Madagascar – INSTN 2000. |
[15] | International Standard Organisation (ISO 4037-1) X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosimeters and doserate meters and for deterging their response as a function of photon energy, 12, 15-1996, Suisse. |
[16] | OFFICE DE PROTECTION CONTRE LES RAYONNEMENTS IONISANTS ET SOCIETE FRANCAISE DE RADIOLOGIE, Les procédures radiologiques des critères de qualité et optimisation des doses, Transposition de la Directive 97/43 Euratom, Rapport d’étape du 31 juillet 2000. |
[17] | RAZAKARIMANANA Tahiry, Doses evaluation of some body organs of pediatric patients undergoing chest X-ray examination using thermoluminescent dosimeter, Science Publishing Group, 2017. |
[18] | RAZAKARIMANANA Tahiry, Mémoire de Thèse, Etablissement de la Méthode de Calcul de la Dose Cumulée à l’Organe par l’Outil, Visual Basic Application, Madagascar-INSTN, juillet 2017. |
APA Style
Said Soudjay, Ramanandraibe Marie Jeanne, Ramanantsizehena Georgette Vololona, Raboanary Roland, Randriantseheno Hery Fanja, et al. (2019). Efficiency of Thermoluminescents Dosimeters for Patient Dose Assessment in Medical Radiology in Antananarivo. Radiation Science and Technology, 5(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12
ACS Style
Said Soudjay; Ramanandraibe Marie Jeanne; Ramanantsizehena Georgette Vololona; Raboanary Roland; Randriantseheno Hery Fanja, et al. Efficiency of Thermoluminescents Dosimeters for Patient Dose Assessment in Medical Radiology in Antananarivo. Radiat. Sci. Technol. 2019, 5(1), 5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12
AMA Style
Said Soudjay, Ramanandraibe Marie Jeanne, Ramanantsizehena Georgette Vololona, Raboanary Roland, Randriantseheno Hery Fanja, et al. Efficiency of Thermoluminescents Dosimeters for Patient Dose Assessment in Medical Radiology in Antananarivo. Radiat Sci Technol. 2019;5(1):5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12
@article{10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12, author = {Said Soudjay and Ramanandraibe Marie Jeanne and Ramanantsizehena Georgette Vololona and Raboanary Roland and Randriantseheno Hery Fanja and Rabesiranana Naivo and Randriamora Tiana Harimalala}, title = {Efficiency of Thermoluminescents Dosimeters for Patient Dose Assessment in Medical Radiology in Antananarivo}, journal = {Radiation Science and Technology}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {5-10}, doi = {10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rst.20190501.12}, abstract = {In radiation protection of patients and medical exposure control, the Radcal 3036 dosimeter is the standard device used for radiodiagnostic dosimetry in medical field. However, for various reasons, this device is not always available, resulting in service interruptions. This led us to assess the effectiveness of ThermoLuminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) for the same service. This study consists in setting an appropriate protocol, then comparing the surface doses measured by the dosimeter Radcal 3036 and those measured with TLDs. We selected three radiological departments in Antananarivo. For the four standard examinations selected (thorax, skull, abdomen and pelvis), the results show that the differences between the values measured by the two dosimeters remain below to 5%. These results confirm that TLDs offer a credible alternative for measuring the dose received by the patient during medical radiological examination. Dosimetric monitoring breakup can then be avoided, to the benefit of the safety of the public and patients.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Efficiency of Thermoluminescents Dosimeters for Patient Dose Assessment in Medical Radiology in Antananarivo AU - Said Soudjay AU - Ramanandraibe Marie Jeanne AU - Ramanantsizehena Georgette Vololona AU - Raboanary Roland AU - Randriantseheno Hery Fanja AU - Rabesiranana Naivo AU - Randriamora Tiana Harimalala Y1 - 2019/09/30 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12 DO - 10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12 T2 - Radiation Science and Technology JF - Radiation Science and Technology JO - Radiation Science and Technology SP - 5 EP - 10 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5943 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20190501.12 AB - In radiation protection of patients and medical exposure control, the Radcal 3036 dosimeter is the standard device used for radiodiagnostic dosimetry in medical field. However, for various reasons, this device is not always available, resulting in service interruptions. This led us to assess the effectiveness of ThermoLuminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) for the same service. This study consists in setting an appropriate protocol, then comparing the surface doses measured by the dosimeter Radcal 3036 and those measured with TLDs. We selected three radiological departments in Antananarivo. For the four standard examinations selected (thorax, skull, abdomen and pelvis), the results show that the differences between the values measured by the two dosimeters remain below to 5%. These results confirm that TLDs offer a credible alternative for measuring the dose received by the patient during medical radiological examination. Dosimetric monitoring breakup can then be avoided, to the benefit of the safety of the public and patients. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -