| Peer-Reviewed

Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea

Received: 11 August 2013     Published: 20 September 2013
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate protein quality of maize and cowpea grains and the effect of sprouting on this quality. Both grains were germinated for up to 5 days and the protein qualities were evaluated chemically. The use of chemical evaluation is to circumvent the use of animal studies to monitor protein qualities in biological systems which are not perfect measures. The chemical parameters employed were chemical score, essential amino acid index (EAAI), biological value and protein requirement index. The result showed no appreciable change in the parameters tested after germination except for consistent amino acid lysine being limiting as the germination time progresses.This study had shown that contrary to expectations of improvement in protein quality during germination, there was no significant changes even at 5% probability level.

Published in International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17
Page(s) 254-260
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Germination, Protein Evaluation, Amino Acids, In-Vitro Digestibility, Chemical Score, Biological Value

References
[1] ALTSCHUL, A. M., YATSU L. Y., ORY R. L. and ENGLEMAN E. M. (1966). Seed
[2] Proteins. Ann. Rev. physiol. 17: 113.
[3] BAU, H. M. and DERBY G. (1979). Germinated soy protein products: chemical
[4] and nutritional Evaluation. J. Am. Oil chem.. Sci. 56: 160.
[5] CHEN, L. H. and THACKER R. (1978). Germination and nitrogenous constituents of
[6] pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.) J. Food Sci. 43. 1884.
[7] CUNNINGGHAM, S. D., CARTER C. M. and MATTIL K. F. (1978). Effect of germination
[8] on cotton seed protein. J. Food Sci. 43: 102.
[9] DESIKACHAR, H. S. R. and DE S. S. (1950). The trypsin inhibitor and availability of
[10] cystine and methionine in raw and germinated soya beans. Biochem Biophys. Acta. 5: 285.
[11] EGGUM, B. D. (1968). Evaluation of protein quality and the development of
[12] screening techniques. Panel on new approach
[13] EVERSON, G. J., STEENBOCK M. and CEDERQUIST M. (1944). The effect of germination
[14] on the age of maturity, and variety upon the nutritive value of soybean protein. J. Nutr. 27: 225.
[15] FAO/WHO (1965). Expert group Joint report : WHO protein requirement. WHO
[16] Technical rept. Ser. No. 301. WHO, Geneva.
[17] FORDHAM, J. R., WELLS C. E. and CHEN L. H. (1975). Sprouting of seeds and
[18] nutrients composition of seeds and sprouts.
[19] FRENCH, D. (1954). The raffinose family of oligosaccharides. Adv. Carbohyd. Chem.. 9: 149.
[20] HAMAD, A. M. and FIELDS M. L. (1970). Evaluation of the protein quality and
[21] available lysine of germinated and fermented cereals. 44: 456.
[22] HAMILTON, M. J. and VANDERSTOEP J. (1979). Germination and nutrient composition
[23] of alfalfa seeds. J. Food Sci. 44: 443.
[24] HARRISON, J. E. (1980). The effects of various growth conditions on the
[25] nutritive composition of alfalfa sprouts.
[26] HSU, D. LEUNG H. K., FINNEY P. L. and MORAD M. M. (1980). Effect of germination
[27] on nutritive value and baking properties of dry peas, lentils and faba beans. J. Food Sci. 45: 87.
[28] JUO, P. and STOTZKY G. (1970). Changes in protein spectra of beans seed
[29] during germination. Can. J. Bot. 48:1347.
[30] KHAN, M. A. and GHAFOOR A. (1978). The effect of soaking, germination and cooking
[31] on the protein quality of mash beans (Phaseoulus mungo). J. Sci. Food Agric. 29: 461.
[32] KOLLER, D., MAYER A. M., POLJAKOFF-MAYER A. and KLEIN S. (1962). Seed
[33] germination. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 13: 437.
[34] KUMAR, G. K. and VENKATORAM L. V. (1975). Changes in reserve proteins of
[35] cowpea, chickpea and green-gram during germination: Physico chemical studies. J. Food Sci. and Technol. 12: 292.
[36] KYLEN, A. M. and MCCREEDY R. M. (1975). Nutrients in seeds and sprouts of
[37] alfalfa, lentils, mung beans and soy beans . J. Food Sci. 40: 1008.
[38] MILLER, D. S. and PAYNE P. R. (1959). A ballistic bomb caloricmeter. Brit. J. Nutr.
[39] 0.889583333
[40] OSER, B. L. (1959). An integrated essential amino acid index for predicting the
[41] biological value of proteins. In: Protein and amino acid nutrition (ed. A. A. Albanese). and legumes. Nutr. Report Int. 11:313.
[42] PALMER, R., McINTOSH A. and PUSZTAI A. (1973). The nutritional evaluation of
[43] kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). The effect of nutritional value of sed germination and changes in trypsin nhibitor content.J. Sci. Food Agric. 24: 937.
[44] SAID, A. K. and HEGSTED D. M. (1969). Evaluation of dietary protein quality in
[45] adult rats. J. Nutr. 99: 474
[46] SAUNDERS, R. M., CONNOR M. A., BOOTH A. I. N., BRICKOFF E. M. and KOHLER G. O.
[47] (1973). Measurement of digestibility of alfalfa protein concentrates by vivo and vitro methods. J. Nutr. 103: 530.
[48] SHEFFENER, A. L., ECKFELDT G. A. and SPECTOR H. (1956). The pepsin digest
[49] residue (PDR) amino acid index of net protein utilization. J. Nutr. 60: 105.
[50] SUBBULAKSHMI, G., KUMAR G. K. and VENKATARAMAN L. V. (1976). Effect
[51] of germination on the carbohydrates, proteins, trypsin inhibitor, amylase inhibitor and haemaglitinin in horse gram and moth bean. Nutr. Report Int. 13: 19.
[52] VENKATARAMAN, L. V., JAYA T. V. and KRISHNAMARTHY K. S. (1976). Effect
[53] of germination on the biological value, digestibility coefficient and net protein utilization of some legume proteins. Nutr. Dietet. 15: 9.
[54] WALKER, A. F. (1981). The application of in vitro methods to the estimation of
[55] protein quality of leaf protein concentrates. PhD Thesis, University of Reading, Reading, England.
[56] WANG, Y. D. and FIELDS M. L. (1978). Germination of corn and sorghum in the home to
[57] improve nutritional value. J. Food. Sci. 43: 1113.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Malomo, Olu., Alamu, E. A., Oluwajoba, et al. (2013). Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 2(5), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Malomo; Olu.; Alamu; E. A.; Oluwajoba, et al. Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 2(5), 254-260. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Malomo, Olu., Alamu, E. A., Oluwajoba, et al. Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2013;2(5):254-260. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17,
      author = {Malomo and Olu. and Alamu and E. A. and Oluwajoba and S. O.},
      title = {Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea},
      journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {254-260},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20130205.17},
      abstract = {This study was carried out to evaluate protein quality of maize and cowpea grains and the effect of sprouting on this quality. Both grains were germinated for up to 5 days and the protein qualities were evaluated chemically. The use of chemical evaluation is to circumvent the use of animal studies to monitor protein qualities in biological systems which are not perfect measures. The chemical parameters employed were chemical score, essential amino acid index (EAAI), biological value and protein requirement index. The result showed no appreciable change in the parameters tested after germination except for consistent amino acid lysine being limiting as the germination time progresses.This study had shown that contrary to expectations of improvement in protein quality during germination, there was no significant changes even at 5% probability level.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea
    AU  - Malomo
    AU  - Olu.
    AU  - Alamu
    AU  - E. A.
    AU  - Oluwajoba
    AU  - S. O.
    Y1  - 2013/09/20
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17
    T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
    SP  - 254
    EP  - 260
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-2716
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17
    AB  - This study was carried out to evaluate protein quality of maize and cowpea grains and the effect of sprouting on this quality. Both grains were germinated for up to 5 days and the protein qualities were evaluated chemically. The use of chemical evaluation is to circumvent the use of animal studies to monitor protein qualities in biological systems which are not perfect measures. The chemical parameters employed were chemical score, essential amino acid index (EAAI), biological value and protein requirement index. The result showed no appreciable change in the parameters tested after germination except for consistent amino acid lysine being limiting as the germination time progresses.This study had shown that contrary to expectations of improvement in protein quality during germination, there was no significant changes even at 5% probability level.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections