There is a growing body of literature in sustainability that analyzes stakeholder perceptions of climate change and associated impacts. However, significant research has not been documented from the spectrum of Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Survey Analysis using a chi-square test for homogeneity, that examine local and regional (State-level) stakeholders’ climate-impact perceptions. In this paper, authors explore the types of climate-related information sources that local, regional, and non-profit stakeholders use. The authors also develop and examine the map of the flow of climate-related impact perceptions. Additionally, the researchers determine whether there are observable patterns in the stakeholders' approaches for securing climate-related information. The Social Network Analysis results present the relationship and the map of climate-impact perceptions among critical stakeholders in Florida that are involved in climate issues. Comparing and examining the SNA results with that chi-square constitute the final finding of the network pattern.
Published in | International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11 |
Page(s) | 6-20 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Climate Change Impacts, Perceptions, Survey, Chi-square Test, Social Network Analysis, Florida
[1] | IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C. B., V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1132 pp. |
[2] | IPCC, 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Field, C. B., V. Barros, T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, D. J. Dokken, K. L. Ebi, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S. K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P. M. Midgley (Eds.) Available from Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8RU ENGLAND, 582 pp. Available from June 2012. |
[3] | IPCC, 2011. Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Ottmar Edenhofer, Ramón Pichs-Madruga, Youba Sokona, Kristin Seyboth, Patrick Matschoss, Susanne Kadner, Timm Zwickel, Patrick Eickemeier, Gerrit Hansen, Steffen Schloemer, Christoph von Stechow (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1075 pp. |
[4] | IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 996 pp. |
[5] | IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. In J. J. McCarthy, O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken and K. S. White, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1000 pp. |
[6] | IPCC. 1995. Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Impacts Assessment: Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC. in W. J. McG. Tegart, G. W. Sheldon and D. C. Griffiths (eds.). Australian Government Publishing Service, Camberra, Australia 294 pp. |
[7] | IPCC. 1990. Climate Change 1990: The IPCC Impacts Assessment: Contribution of Working Group II to the First Assessment Report of the IPCC. in W. J. McG. Tegart, G. W. Sheldon and D. C. Griffiths (eds.). Australian Government Publishing Service, Camberra, Australia 294 pp. |
[8] | NOAA, 2007. National Climate Report. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/200713 |
[9] | Bartels, W. L., Furman, C. A., Diehl, D. C., Royce, F. S., Dourte, D. R., Ortiz, B. V.,... & Jones, J. W., 2013: Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the Southeast US. Regional Environmental Change, 13(1), 45-55. |
[10] | Bellon, M. R., Hodson, D., and Hellin, J., 2011: Assessing the vulnerability of traditional maize seed systems in Mexico to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(33), 13432-13437. |
[11] | Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. and Upham, P., 2015. International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1), pp. 35-61. |
[12] | Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. (81). Freeman, LC., 2002: UCInet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard: MA. |
[13] | Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B. and Read, D., 1994: What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959-970. |
[14] | Carolan, B. V. and Wasserman, S. J., 2014. Does parenting style matter. |
[15] | Croft, D. P., James, R. and Krause, J., 2008. Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press. |
[16] | Cross, R. L. and Parker, A., 2004. The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Harvard Business Review Press. |
[17] | Dwayne E. P. and Coauthors, 2004: Data Management in Support of Environmental Monitoring, Research, and Coastal Management in Journal of Coastal Research, 45: 9-16. |
[18] | Freeman, L. C., 1977: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 35-41. |
[19] | Hanneman, R. A., 2001: The prestige of Ph. D. granting departments of sociology: a simple network approach. Connections, 24(1), 68-77. |
[20] | Kleiner, B. M., Hettinger, L. J., DeJoy, D. M., Huang, Y. H. and Love, P. E., 2015. Sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe work systems. Ergonomics, 58(4), pp. 635-649. |
[21] | Kohut J. and Coauthors, 2012: Evaluation of two algorithms for a network of coastal HF radars in the Mid-Atlantic Bight in Ocean Dynamics, 62:953–968. |
[22] | McPhaden, J. M., and Coauthors, 1998: The Tropical Ocean-Global Atmosphere observing system: A decade of progress in Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(C7), 14,169-14,240. |
[23] | Mochizuki, J., Schinko, T. and Hochrainer-Stigler, S., 2018. Mainstreaming of climate extreme risk into fiscal and budgetary planning: application of stochastic debt and disaster fund analysis in Austria. Regional Environmental Change, pp. 1-12. |
[24] | Robert G. D. Steel and James H. Torrie, 1980 “Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach” Second Edition, pp 477-478. |
[25] | Shackley, S., and Deanwood, R., 2002: Stakeholder perceptions of climate change impacts at the regional scale: Implications for the effectiveness of regional and local responses. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 45(3), 381-402. |
[26] | Tobin, G. A. and Begley, C. M., 2004. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of advanced nursing, 48(4), pp. 388-396. |
[27] | Whitehead, H., 2009. SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(5), pp. 765-778. |
[28] | Caetano, F. J., Oliveira, C. M., Araújo, M. F. and Rêgo, M. C., 2018. Towards Climate Change Awareness Through Distance Learning—Are Young Portuguese and Brazilian University Students Vigilant?. In Climate Literacy and Innovations in Climate Change Education (pp. 261-273). Springer, Cham. |
[29] | Ngo, V. D., Frank, L. D. and Bigazzi, A. Y., 2018. Effects of new urban greenways on transportation energy use and greenhouse gas emissions: A longitudinal study from Vancouver, Canada. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, pp. 715-725. |
[30] | Steentjes, K., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., Corner, A. J., Arnold, A., Böhm, G., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Ruddat, M., Scheer, D. and Sonnberger, M., 2017. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. |
APA Style
Vassiki Sanogo, Julie Harrington, Zafar Siddiqui. (2018). Information Sources, Awareness, and Perception Levels About Climate Change Impacts: A Case Study on Florida Stakeholders. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 3(2), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11
ACS Style
Vassiki Sanogo; Julie Harrington; Zafar Siddiqui. Information Sources, Awareness, and Perception Levels About Climate Change Impacts: A Case Study on Florida Stakeholders. Int. J. Econ. Energy Environ. 2018, 3(2), 6-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11
AMA Style
Vassiki Sanogo, Julie Harrington, Zafar Siddiqui. Information Sources, Awareness, and Perception Levels About Climate Change Impacts: A Case Study on Florida Stakeholders. Int J Econ Energy Environ. 2018;3(2):6-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11, author = {Vassiki Sanogo and Julie Harrington and Zafar Siddiqui}, title = {Information Sources, Awareness, and Perception Levels About Climate Change Impacts: A Case Study on Florida Stakeholders}, journal = {International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {6-20}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeee.20180302.11}, abstract = {There is a growing body of literature in sustainability that analyzes stakeholder perceptions of climate change and associated impacts. However, significant research has not been documented from the spectrum of Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Survey Analysis using a chi-square test for homogeneity, that examine local and regional (State-level) stakeholders’ climate-impact perceptions. In this paper, authors explore the types of climate-related information sources that local, regional, and non-profit stakeholders use. The authors also develop and examine the map of the flow of climate-related impact perceptions. Additionally, the researchers determine whether there are observable patterns in the stakeholders' approaches for securing climate-related information. The Social Network Analysis results present the relationship and the map of climate-impact perceptions among critical stakeholders in Florida that are involved in climate issues. Comparing and examining the SNA results with that chi-square constitute the final finding of the network pattern.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Information Sources, Awareness, and Perception Levels About Climate Change Impacts: A Case Study on Florida Stakeholders AU - Vassiki Sanogo AU - Julie Harrington AU - Zafar Siddiqui Y1 - 2018/08/01 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11 T2 - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment JF - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment JO - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment SP - 6 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5021 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20180302.11 AB - There is a growing body of literature in sustainability that analyzes stakeholder perceptions of climate change and associated impacts. However, significant research has not been documented from the spectrum of Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Survey Analysis using a chi-square test for homogeneity, that examine local and regional (State-level) stakeholders’ climate-impact perceptions. In this paper, authors explore the types of climate-related information sources that local, regional, and non-profit stakeholders use. The authors also develop and examine the map of the flow of climate-related impact perceptions. Additionally, the researchers determine whether there are observable patterns in the stakeholders' approaches for securing climate-related information. The Social Network Analysis results present the relationship and the map of climate-impact perceptions among critical stakeholders in Florida that are involved in climate issues. Comparing and examining the SNA results with that chi-square constitute the final finding of the network pattern. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -