Gender equality and women in particular have recently gained attention by researchers, development organizations and human rights activists. The issues around gender and the inequality that exists have been evidenced most in less developed countries including Uganda. In regard to the present paper, critical reviews have eloquently provided empirical and conclusive issues that places women at a disadvantage in economic growth and societal development. Objectively, it provides a clear sense of direction for policy review and development concerns. Various research papers, reports and findings were critically investigated and found out that women were more inferiorly treated than men, and hence gender inequality exercised. World over, stylized evidences from different models and theories recognize the role of women in development. They are into livelihood and productivity, education, agriculture and health. In the recent times, where we have high level of industrialization and digitalization, women though not fully recognized, a lot is done by them to produce and market both industrial and agricultural products. The literature outlines that dynamics and issues around gender span from the aspect of economic development, including but not limited to women involvement in resource allocation, legal structures on inheritance, power in politics and household decision making, labour and credit market access, education and others. Our review findings indicate the need for extra engagement with gender as a unit of analysis in developing nations, with further engagement on inclusive and intersectional feminisms.
| Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13 |
| Page(s) | 217-221 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gender Issues, Gender, Women in Sustainable Development, Gender Equality, Women
| [1] | Akram-Lodhi, A. H., & Komba, I. (2018). What are the factors driving the gender gap in agricultural productivity in Tanzania? https://info.undp.org/docs/pdc/Documents/TZA/Final Report Gender Gap April 2018.pdf |
| [2] | Amirkhanyan, H., Krawczyk, M. W., & Wilamowski, M. (2021). Gender inequality and national gender gaps in overconfidence. PLoS ONE, 16 (4 April), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249459 |
| [3] | Ansara, Y. G., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research. Feminism & Psychology, 24 (2), 259–270. |
| [4] | Ayele, S., Khan, S., & Sumberg, J. (2017). Introduction: New perspectives on Africa’s youth employment challenge. |
| [5] | Barrett, C., & Sheahan, M. B. (2014). Understanding the Agricultural Input Landscape in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recent Plot, Household, and Community-Level Evidence. In World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (No. 7014; Issue 7014). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7014 |
| [6] | Brett. (2020). Why Gender is a Development Issue (p. 3). |
| [7] | Charleston, L. J., George, P. L., Jackson, J. F. L., Berhanu, J., & Amechi, M. H. (2014). Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in US computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7 (3), 166. |
| [8] | Cuberes, D., & Teignier, M. (2014). Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Critical Review. Journal of International Development, 26 (10–13), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2983 |
| [9] | El-Hamidi, F., & Said, M. (2005). Wage inequality by education and gender in MENA: Contrasting the Egyptian and Moroccan experiences in the 1990s. |
| [10] | Erika, J. K. (2019). DOES COFFEE MATTER?: WOMEN AND DEVELOPMENT IN RWANDA (Vol. 53, Issue 9) [Northeastern University, Boston Massachusetts]. www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id |
| [11] | Fausto-Sterling, A., Coll, C. G., & Lamarre, M. (2012). Sexing the baby: Part 1 – What do we really know about sex differentiation in the first three years of life? Social Science & Medicine, 74 (11), 16841692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.051 |
| [12] | FAO. (2016). Gender, food security and nutrition in protracted crises. In Women and girls as agents of resilience. |
| [13] | FAO. (2020). FAO Policy on Gender Equality 2020–2030. http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules |
| [14] | Ferrant, G., Pesando, L. M., & Nowacka, K. (2014). Unpaid Care Work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes. Boulogne Billancourt: OECD Development Center. |
| [15] | Heidensohn, F., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2012). Gender and crime. The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 5, 336–369. |
| [16] | Hivos. (2014). Sustainable coffee as a Family Business (C. McCarthy, S. Angelica, M. Marjoleine, L. Anna, V. Mieke, & T. Jacqueline (eds.)). Hivos. |
| [17] | Horst, M., & Marion, A. (2019). Racial, ethnic and gender inequities in farmland ownership and farming in the US. Agriculture and Human Values, 36 (1), 1–16. |
| [18] | Huyer, S. (2016). Closing the Gender Gap in Agriculture. Gender, Technology and Development, 20 (2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852416643872 |
| [19] | Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74 (2), 171. |
| [20] | ICO. (2018). Gender equality in coffee sector: An insight report from the International Coffee Organization. In Icc-122-11. www.ico.org |
| [21] | Lieberson, S., Dumais, S., & Baumann, S. (2000). The instability of androgynous names: The symbolic maintenance of gender boundaries. American Journal of Sociology, 105 (5), 1249–1287. |
| [22] | Lima, P. O., Calil, C. M., & Marcondes, F. K. (2013). Influence of gender and stress on the volatile sulfur compounds and stress biomarkers production. Oral Diseases, 19 (4), 366–373. |
| [23] | Morais, M. H. (2017). Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU. Intereconomics, 52 (3), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0669-4 |
| [24] | Moss-Racusin, C. A., van der Toorn, J., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2016). A “scientific diversity” intervention to reduce gender bias in a sample of life scientists. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15 (3), ar29. |
| [25] | Mukasa, A. N., Salami, A. O., Kayizzi-mugerwa, S., & John, C. (2015). Gender productivity differentials among smallholder farmers in Africa: A cross-country comparison. In African Development Research group Working paper series 231 (No. 231; 231). https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/WPS_No_231_Gender_productivity_differentials_among_smallholder_farmers_in_Africa__A_cross-country_comparison.pdf |
| [26] | Ochago, R. (2017). Barriers to women’s participation in coffee pest management learning groups in Mt Elgon Region, Uganda. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 3 (1), 1358338. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2017.1358338 |
| [27] | Roberts, A., & Mir Zulfiqar, G. (2019). The political economy of women’s entrepreneurship initiatives in Pakistan: reflections on gender, class, and “development.” Review of International Political Economy, 26 (3), 410–435. |
| [28] | Roberts, & Brown, D. K. (2019). How to manage gender bias from within: Women in leadership. Journal of Business Diversity, 19 (2), 83–98. |
| [29] | Smith, T. B., Vacca, R., Mantegazza, L., & Capua, I. (2021). Natural language processing and network analysis provide novel insights on policy and scientific discourse around Sustainable Development Goals. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 1–10. |
| [30] | Sorariutta, A., & Silvén, M. (2018). Quality of both parents’ cognitive guidance and quantity of early childhood education: Influences on pre-mathematical development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (2), 192–215. |
| [31] | Sraboni, E., Malapit, H. J., Quisumbing, A. R., & Ahmed, A. U. (2014). Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture: What Role for Food Security in Bangladesh? World Development, 61, 11–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.025 |
| [32] | Tian, H., Lu, C., Yang, J., Banger, K., Huntzinger, D. N., Schwalm, C. R., Michalak, A. M., Cook, R., Ciais, P., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Lei, H., Mao, J., Pan, S., Post, W. M., Peng, S., Poulter, B., … Zeng, N. (2015). The Role of Women in Agriculture. In ESA Working Paper (No. 11–02; March 2011, Vol. 29, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021 |
| [33] | UBOS. (2012). Agricultural Sector: Gender Statistics Profile (Issue November). |
| [34] | UN Women, UNDP, UNEP, W. B. (2015). The Cost of the Gender Gap in Agricultural Productivity in Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. |
| [35] | UN WOMEN. (2018). The Gender Gap in Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Causes, Costs and Solutions (No. 11; Policy Brief). |
| [36] | UNDP. (2015). Evaluation of UNDP contribution to Gender equality and women’s empowerment. |
| [37] | Villarreal, M. (2015). Decreasing Gender Inequality in Agriculture: Key to Eradicating Hunger. Journal of World Affairs, 20 (1), 169–177. |
| [38] | Walker, K. A. (2018). Gender gap in professional entomology: Women are underrepresented in academia and the US government. In Annals of the Entomological Society of America (Vol. 111, Issue 6). Oxford University Press US. |
| [39] | Weaver, R. K. (2014). Compliance regimes and barriers to behavioral change. Governance, 27 (2), 243–265. |
| [40] | Westbrook, L., & Saperstein, A. (2015). New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society, 29 (4), 534–560. |
| [41] | World Bank. (2012). Annual Report Report 2012. |
| [42] | World Bank. (2016). Gender Equality, Poverty Reduction and Inclusive Growth. |
| [43] | World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Gender Gap Report 2020: Insight Report. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf |
APA Style
Godfrey Alinaitwe, Dick Sserunkuuma, David Twinomugyisha. (2022). Critical Reviews on Gender-Women Issues in Sustainable Development. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 11(4), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13
ACS Style
Godfrey Alinaitwe; Dick Sserunkuuma; David Twinomugyisha. Critical Reviews on Gender-Women Issues in Sustainable Development. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2022, 11(4), 217-221. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13,
author = {Godfrey Alinaitwe and Dick Sserunkuuma and David Twinomugyisha},
title = {Critical Reviews on Gender-Women Issues in Sustainable Development},
journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {217-221},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20221104.13},
abstract = {Gender equality and women in particular have recently gained attention by researchers, development organizations and human rights activists. The issues around gender and the inequality that exists have been evidenced most in less developed countries including Uganda. In regard to the present paper, critical reviews have eloquently provided empirical and conclusive issues that places women at a disadvantage in economic growth and societal development. Objectively, it provides a clear sense of direction for policy review and development concerns. Various research papers, reports and findings were critically investigated and found out that women were more inferiorly treated than men, and hence gender inequality exercised. World over, stylized evidences from different models and theories recognize the role of women in development. They are into livelihood and productivity, education, agriculture and health. In the recent times, where we have high level of industrialization and digitalization, women though not fully recognized, a lot is done by them to produce and market both industrial and agricultural products. The literature outlines that dynamics and issues around gender span from the aspect of economic development, including but not limited to women involvement in resource allocation, legal structures on inheritance, power in politics and household decision making, labour and credit market access, education and others. Our review findings indicate the need for extra engagement with gender as a unit of analysis in developing nations, with further engagement on inclusive and intersectional feminisms.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Critical Reviews on Gender-Women Issues in Sustainable Development AU - Godfrey Alinaitwe AU - Dick Sserunkuuma AU - David Twinomugyisha Y1 - 2022/08/09 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 217 EP - 221 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221104.13 AB - Gender equality and women in particular have recently gained attention by researchers, development organizations and human rights activists. The issues around gender and the inequality that exists have been evidenced most in less developed countries including Uganda. In regard to the present paper, critical reviews have eloquently provided empirical and conclusive issues that places women at a disadvantage in economic growth and societal development. Objectively, it provides a clear sense of direction for policy review and development concerns. Various research papers, reports and findings were critically investigated and found out that women were more inferiorly treated than men, and hence gender inequality exercised. World over, stylized evidences from different models and theories recognize the role of women in development. They are into livelihood and productivity, education, agriculture and health. In the recent times, where we have high level of industrialization and digitalization, women though not fully recognized, a lot is done by them to produce and market both industrial and agricultural products. The literature outlines that dynamics and issues around gender span from the aspect of economic development, including but not limited to women involvement in resource allocation, legal structures on inheritance, power in politics and household decision making, labour and credit market access, education and others. Our review findings indicate the need for extra engagement with gender as a unit of analysis in developing nations, with further engagement on inclusive and intersectional feminisms. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: