Nano technology increases the nutrient use efficiency. The experiment to test nano fertilizers on tef was conducted at the teff crop producing areas of Adet, Meray, and Meshenti areas. A total of sixteen fertilizer combinations of urea, DAP (Di Amonium phosphate) and Nano fertilizers including without fertilizer and without nano checks were tested on 2m X 1.5m plot size. The materials were planted in RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) with three replications. Spacing between replications and plots were 1 meter and 0.5 meter respectively. The seed and fertilizer rates were used as per recommendation rate per hectare bases. The nano fertilizer was tested as early as seed dressing and field spray during tillering stage. The performances of nano fertilizer over all locations have shown consistence results at all locations. Analysis of variance showed that there is a significant difference between the treatments for all parameters including grain yield. The highest grain yield (38 Q/ha) was recorded at the treatment combination of 2gm/ha nano seed dressing, 39g DAP and 10.8g urea. And the least grain yield (2.5 Q/ha) was recorded at treatment combination of no nano and no fertilizer treatments. Here all nano treatment combinations without DAP and urea fertilizers gave grain yield less than 7Q/ha. Which implies that Nano fertilizers cannot act solely without DAP and Urea. The least maturity date (119 dates) and the highest plant height (132.4 cm) was also recorded at a treatment combination of 2gm/ha nano seed dressing, 39g DAP and 10.8g urea. This implies that the crop at these treatments was vigor and was able to mature early.
| Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14 |
| Page(s) | 237-241 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nano, Tef Seed Dressing, Spray, Tillering, Days to Maturity, Grain Yield
| [1] | Abobatta WF., “Nanotechnology Application in Agriculture”. Acta Scientific Agriculture 2: 99-102 (2018). |
| [2] | Aysan G., Kamran A., Mohammadreza Y. and Hamidreza A., “Effects of Nano-Potassium and Nano-Calcium Chelated Fertilizers on Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics of Ocimum basilicum”. IJPRS 3: 235-241 (2014). |
| [3] | Conley D. J, Paerl HW., Howarth RW., Boesch DF. and Seitzinger SP., Ecology controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science 323: 1014-1015 (2009). |
| [4] | Corradini E., de Moura M. R. and Mattoso L. K.,“A Preliminary Study of the Incorporation of NPK Fertilizer into Chitosan Nanoparticles”, DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.6, express polymer letters vol. 4, no. 8 (2010) 509–515, 30 April 2010. |
| [5] | Correll DL., “The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: a review”. J. Environ 27: 261-266 (1998). |
| [6] | De Rosa MC., Monreal C., Schnitzer M., Walsh R. and Sultan Y., “Nanotechnology in fertilizers”. Nat Nano-technol 5: 91 (2010). |
| [7] | EPA “Healthy lawn, healthy environment, prevention and pesticide and toxic substances”. 735-K-04-001 (2004). |
| [8] | Guo JH., Liu XJ., Zhang Y., Shen JL., Han WX. et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327: 1008-1010 (2010). |
| [9] | Gutierrez FJ., Mussons ML., Gaton P. and Rojo R., Nanotechnology and Food Industry. Scientific, Health and Social Aspects of the Food Industry, In Tech, Croatia Book Chapter (2011). |
| [10] | Mousavi SR. and Rezaei M.,” Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production”. J. Appl. Environ. Biol Sci 1: 414-419 (2011). |
| [11] | Sadik O. A., Zhou A. L., Kikandi S., Wang N. Q. and Varner K., “ Sensors As Tools For Quantitation, Nanotoxicity And Nano Monitoring Assessment Of Engineered Nanomaterials”, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, DOI: 10.1039/b912860c, 14 September 2009. |
| [12] | Tarafdar JC., Raliya R., Mahawar H. and Rathore I.,” Development of Zinc Nano-fertilizer to Enhance Crop Production in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum)”. Agricultural Research 3: 257-262 (2014). |
| [13] | Tarafdar J. and Raliya C., “Rapid, low-cost, and ecofriendly approach for iron nanoparticle synthesis using aspergillus oryzae”, TFR9. Journal of Nanoparticles Article ID: 141274, pp: 4 pages (2013). |
| [14] | Tisdale SL., Nelson WL. and Beaton JD.,” Soil Fertility and Fertilizer”. 4th Edition, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. pp: 754 (1985). |
| [15] | Tothill I. E., “Biosensors developments and potential applications in the agricultural diagnosis sector”, Elsiver Science, Computers and electronics in agriculture, 0168-1699/01, 205-218, 30 (2001). |
APA Style
Mersha Tezera. (2021). The Effect of Nano Fertilizer on Teff Yield and Yield Components in Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 7(5), 237-241. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14
ACS Style
Mersha Tezera. The Effect of Nano Fertilizer on Teff Yield and Yield Components in Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2021, 7(5), 237-241. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14
AMA Style
Mersha Tezera. The Effect of Nano Fertilizer on Teff Yield and Yield Components in Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2021;7(5):237-241. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14,
author = {Mersha Tezera},
title = {The Effect of Nano Fertilizer on Teff Yield and Yield Components in Ethiopia},
journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
volume = {7},
number = {5},
pages = {237-241},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20210705.14},
abstract = {Nano technology increases the nutrient use efficiency. The experiment to test nano fertilizers on tef was conducted at the teff crop producing areas of Adet, Meray, and Meshenti areas. A total of sixteen fertilizer combinations of urea, DAP (Di Amonium phosphate) and Nano fertilizers including without fertilizer and without nano checks were tested on 2m X 1.5m plot size. The materials were planted in RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) with three replications. Spacing between replications and plots were 1 meter and 0.5 meter respectively. The seed and fertilizer rates were used as per recommendation rate per hectare bases. The nano fertilizer was tested as early as seed dressing and field spray during tillering stage. The performances of nano fertilizer over all locations have shown consistence results at all locations. Analysis of variance showed that there is a significant difference between the treatments for all parameters including grain yield. The highest grain yield (38 Q/ha) was recorded at the treatment combination of 2gm/ha nano seed dressing, 39g DAP and 10.8g urea. And the least grain yield (2.5 Q/ha) was recorded at treatment combination of no nano and no fertilizer treatments. Here all nano treatment combinations without DAP and urea fertilizers gave grain yield less than 7Q/ha. Which implies that Nano fertilizers cannot act solely without DAP and Urea. The least maturity date (119 dates) and the highest plant height (132.4 cm) was also recorded at a treatment combination of 2gm/ha nano seed dressing, 39g DAP and 10.8g urea. This implies that the crop at these treatments was vigor and was able to mature early.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of Nano Fertilizer on Teff Yield and Yield Components in Ethiopia AU - Mersha Tezera Y1 - 2021/10/30 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 237 EP - 241 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.14 AB - Nano technology increases the nutrient use efficiency. The experiment to test nano fertilizers on tef was conducted at the teff crop producing areas of Adet, Meray, and Meshenti areas. A total of sixteen fertilizer combinations of urea, DAP (Di Amonium phosphate) and Nano fertilizers including without fertilizer and without nano checks were tested on 2m X 1.5m plot size. The materials were planted in RCBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) with three replications. Spacing between replications and plots were 1 meter and 0.5 meter respectively. The seed and fertilizer rates were used as per recommendation rate per hectare bases. The nano fertilizer was tested as early as seed dressing and field spray during tillering stage. The performances of nano fertilizer over all locations have shown consistence results at all locations. Analysis of variance showed that there is a significant difference between the treatments for all parameters including grain yield. The highest grain yield (38 Q/ha) was recorded at the treatment combination of 2gm/ha nano seed dressing, 39g DAP and 10.8g urea. And the least grain yield (2.5 Q/ha) was recorded at treatment combination of no nano and no fertilizer treatments. Here all nano treatment combinations without DAP and urea fertilizers gave grain yield less than 7Q/ha. Which implies that Nano fertilizers cannot act solely without DAP and Urea. The least maturity date (119 dates) and the highest plant height (132.4 cm) was also recorded at a treatment combination of 2gm/ha nano seed dressing, 39g DAP and 10.8g urea. This implies that the crop at these treatments was vigor and was able to mature early. VL - 7 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: