Observational evidence from different aspects, such as temperature, sea level, etc., has brought climate change to the attention. The impacts caused by it will vary regionally but will increase over time as global temperatures increase. Many adaptation and mitigation options can help address climate change. While buildings hold important key to effectively addressing climate change by applying mitigation technologies and policies because buildings accounts for large part of global final energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. This paper focuses on climate change mitigation in building sector so as to find out proper methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance resilience to climate change. It summarizes the mitigation technologies in building sector, its opportunities and challenges, and sectoral polices. Then it analyzes the roles of stakeholders in building sector. Finally, the mitigation in Norway, which is with high vulnerabilities, is stated as a case study to present a country’s responses to climate change in building sector. It has been proved that applying appropriate mitigation technologies and policies, and integrating different stakeholders together properly with recognizing their roles can effectively make a great effort to global climate change mitigation. Only when climate change is regard as important and mitigation technologies and policies are applied properly especially in building sector, can we achieve the sustainable development.
Published in | International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications (Volume 4, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12 |
Page(s) | 38-46 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Climate Change, Mitigation Technology, Building Sector, Norway
[1] | GlobalChange.gov. (2014), What’s Happening & Why. [online] Available at: http://www.globalchange.gov/climate-change/whats-happening-why [Accessed 29 Mar. 2017]. |
[2] | IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 155pp. |
[3] | Epa.gov. (2014). Climate Impacts on Ecosystems. [online] Available at: https://www.epa.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impacts-ecosystems [Accessed 29 Mar. 2017]. |
[4] | Chalmers, P. (2014). Climate Change: Implications for Buildings. ECF, BPIE, GBPN, WBCSD, CJBS & CISL, 18PP. |
[5] | IEA. (2013). Transitions to Sustainable Buildings: Strategies and Opportunities to 2050. IEA, Paris, France, 10PP. |
[6] | UNEP. (2009). Opportunities for Actions with High Mitigation Potential. [online] Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/smsn/igo/153.pdf [Accessed 2 Apr. 2017]. |
[7] | Stevanvoić, S. (2013). Optimization of Passive Solar Design Strategies: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 177-196. |
[8] | Morrissey, J., Moore, T., & Horne, R. E. (2011). Affordable Passive Solar Design in a Temperate Climate: An experiment in residential building orientation. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 568-577. |
[9] | Sadineni, S. B., Madala, S., & Boehm, R. F. (2011). Passive Building Energy Savings: A Review of Building Envelope Components. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3617-3631. |
[10] | Singh, M. C., & Garg, S. N. (2009). Energy Rating of Different Glazings for Indian Climates. Energy, 34(11), 1986-1992. |
[11] | Cam, W. C. (2012). Technologies for Climate Change Mitigation: Building Sector. UNEP. New Delhi: Magnum Custom Publishing, 197PP. |
[12] | Jones, P., Hou, S. S., & Li, X. (2015). Towards Zero Carbon Design in Offices: Integrating Smart Facades, Ventilation, and Surface Heating and Cooling. Renewable Energy, 73, 69-76. |
[13] | Graham C. I. (2009). High-Performance HVAC. In Whole Building Design Guide. Washington D.C.: National Institute of Building Sciences. [Online] Available at: www.wbdg.org/resources/hvac.php [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017]. |
[14] | Chua, K. J., Chou, S. K., Yang, W. M., & Yan, J. (2013). Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning–a review of technologies and strategies. Applied Energy, 104, 87-104. |
[15] | Turner, S. (2015). WET™ – Water Efficient Technologies. Healthy Buildings. Available at: http://healthybuildings.com/wet-water-efficient-technologies/ [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017]. |
[16] | Cam, W. C. (2012). Carbon Sink and Low-carbon Building Materials. ClimateTechWiki. [Online] Available at: http://www.climatetechwiki.org/technology/carbon-sink-and-low-carbon-building-materials [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017]. |
[17] | Cam, W. C. (2012). Greening the Built Environment. ClimateTechWiki. [Online] Available at: http://www.climatetechwiki.org/technology/greening-built-environment [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017]. |
[18] | Lenardic, D. (2015). BIPV - Building Integrated Photovoltaics. Pvresources.com. [online] Available at: http://www.pvresources.com/en/bipv/bipv.php [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017]. |
[19] | Dresser, C. & McKee International Inc. (2002). Study on the potential applications of renewable energy in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Electrical & Mechanical Services Department. |
[20] | Yu, Z., Fung, B. C., Haghighat, F., Yoshino, H., & Morofsky, E. (2011). A Systematic Procedure to Study the Influence of Occupant Behavior on Building Energy Consumption. Energy and Buildings, 43(6), 1409-1417. |
[21] | Lucon O., D. Ürge-Vorsatz, A. Zain Ahmed, H. Akbari, P. Bertoldi, L. F. Cabeza, N. Eyre, A. Gadgil, L. D. D. Harvey, Y. Jiang, E. Liphoto, S. Mirasgedis, S. Murakami, J. Parikh, C. Pyke, and M. V. Vilariño. (2014). Buildings. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 68PP. |
[22] | D. Ürge-Vorsatz. (2007). Climate Change Mitigation in the Building Sector. [online] Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/poznan-COP-14/diane-urge-vorsatz.pdf [Accessed 4 Apr. 2017]. |
[23] | Lambert, G. (2015). Leading Global Collaboration in Climate Change Standards. [online] Available at: https://www.iso.org/news/2015/12/Ref2031.html [Accessed 6 Apr. 2017]. |
[24] | UNEP & SBCI. (2009). Submission of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Sustainable Building Initiative (SBCI) to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA). [online] Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/igo/044.pdf [Accessed 6 Apr. 2017]. |
[25] | Williams, C. Hasanbeigi, A. Wu, G & Price, L. (2012). International Experience with Quantifying the Co-Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Programs and Policies. [online] Available at: https://china.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/co-benefit-executive-summary-english.pdf [Accessed 6 Apr. 2017]. |
[26] | IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. |
[27] | Boza-Kiss, B., Moles-Grueso, S., & Urge-Vorsatz, D. (2013). Evaluating policy instruments to foster energy efficiency for the sustainable transformation of buildings. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(2), 163-176. |
[28] | McGilligan, C., Sunikka-Blank, M., & Natarajan, S. (2010). Subsidy as an agent to enhance the effectiveness of the energy performance certificate. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1272-1287. |
[29] | Bertoldi, P. (2011). Assessment and Experience of White Certificate Schemes in the European Union. European Commission, Directorate General JRC. |
[30] | OUPblog. (2014). What is the Role of Governments in Climate Change Adaptation. [online] Available at: https://blog.oup.com/2014/07/government-adaptation-climate-change/ [Accessed at 9 Apr. 2017] |
[31] | Szarka, J. (2013). From climate advocacy to public engagement: an exploration of the roles of environmental non-governmental organisations. Climate, 1(1), 12-27. |
[32] | Somanathan E., T. Sterner, T. Sugiyama, D. Chimanikire, N. K. Dubash, J. Essandoh-Yeddu, S. Fifita, L. Goulder, A. Jaffe, X. Labandeira, S. Managi, C. Mitchell, J. P. Montero, F. Teng, and T. Zylicz. (2014). National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 66PP. |
[33] | Sbci, U. N. E. P. (2009). Buildings and climate change: Summary for decision-makers. United Nations Environmental Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris, 62PP. |
[34] | The Research Councl of Norway Clean Energy for the Future (RENERGI). Clean Energy for the Future – from Vision to True Alternative. (2013). Oslo: The Research Councl of Norway, 65PP. |
[35] | Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. (2012). Climate Change Adaptation in Norway. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, 107PP. |
[36] | Haase, M., Buvik, K., Dokka, T. H. & Andresen, I. (2010). Guidelines for Energy Efficiency Concepts in Office Buildings in Norway. Oslo: SINTEF Building and Infrastructure. 64PP. |
[37] | Norway. (2015). Norway’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. [online] Available at: http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Norway/1/Norway%20INDC%2026MAR2015.pdf [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017] |
[38] | Climatechangepost.com. (2014). Transport, Infrastructure and Building in Norway. [online] Available at: http://www.climatechangepost.com/norway/transport-infrastructure-and-building/ [Accessed 10 Apr. 2017]. |
[39] | Lisø, K. B., Myhre, L., Kvande, T., Thue, J. V. & Nordvik, V. (2007). A Norwegian perspective on buildings and climate change. Building Research & Information, 35(4), 437-449. |
[40] | Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. (2014). Norway’s Sixth National Communication – Under the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. 300PP. |
[41] | Lisø, K. R. (2006). Building Envelope Performance Assessments in Harsh Climates: Methods for Geographically Dependent Design. Doctoral Theses 2006: 185, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science AND Technology. |
APA Style
Li Muqi. (2018). Climate Change Mitigation Technologies and Policies in Building Sector. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 4(3), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12
ACS Style
Li Muqi. Climate Change Mitigation Technologies and Policies in Building Sector. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2018, 4(3), 38-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12
AMA Style
Li Muqi. Climate Change Mitigation Technologies and Policies in Building Sector. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2018;4(3):38-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12, author = {Li Muqi}, title = {Climate Change Mitigation Technologies and Policies in Building Sector}, journal = {International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, pages = {38-46}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaaa.20180403.12}, abstract = {Observational evidence from different aspects, such as temperature, sea level, etc., has brought climate change to the attention. The impacts caused by it will vary regionally but will increase over time as global temperatures increase. Many adaptation and mitigation options can help address climate change. While buildings hold important key to effectively addressing climate change by applying mitigation technologies and policies because buildings accounts for large part of global final energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. This paper focuses on climate change mitigation in building sector so as to find out proper methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance resilience to climate change. It summarizes the mitigation technologies in building sector, its opportunities and challenges, and sectoral polices. Then it analyzes the roles of stakeholders in building sector. Finally, the mitigation in Norway, which is with high vulnerabilities, is stated as a case study to present a country’s responses to climate change in building sector. It has been proved that applying appropriate mitigation technologies and policies, and integrating different stakeholders together properly with recognizing their roles can effectively make a great effort to global climate change mitigation. Only when climate change is regard as important and mitigation technologies and policies are applied properly especially in building sector, can we achieve the sustainable development.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies and Policies in Building Sector AU - Li Muqi Y1 - 2018/11/10 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12 T2 - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications JF - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications JO - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications SP - 38 EP - 46 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1131 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20180403.12 AB - Observational evidence from different aspects, such as temperature, sea level, etc., has brought climate change to the attention. The impacts caused by it will vary regionally but will increase over time as global temperatures increase. Many adaptation and mitigation options can help address climate change. While buildings hold important key to effectively addressing climate change by applying mitigation technologies and policies because buildings accounts for large part of global final energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. This paper focuses on climate change mitigation in building sector so as to find out proper methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance resilience to climate change. It summarizes the mitigation technologies in building sector, its opportunities and challenges, and sectoral polices. Then it analyzes the roles of stakeholders in building sector. Finally, the mitigation in Norway, which is with high vulnerabilities, is stated as a case study to present a country’s responses to climate change in building sector. It has been proved that applying appropriate mitigation technologies and policies, and integrating different stakeholders together properly with recognizing their roles can effectively make a great effort to global climate change mitigation. Only when climate change is regard as important and mitigation technologies and policies are applied properly especially in building sector, can we achieve the sustainable development. VL - 4 IS - 3 ER -