Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Analysis of the Various Statistical Techniques Applied to Assess Participants' Laboratory Performance in an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Proficiency Testing Program

Received: 8 February 2024    Accepted: 21 February 2024    Published: 7 March 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Outliers in data analysis pose both challenges and opportunities for researchers. On one hand, if not adequately addressed, outliers can distort statistical analyses and lead to flawed conclusions. Conversely, outliers can also offer valuable insights into underlying processes or factors at play. One commonly used method for identifying outliers is through the analysis of interquartile ranges (IQRs). By accurately detecting and treating these anomalies, researchers can ensure the accuracy and validity of their findings. The major causes of outliers in data analysis stem from measurement and sampling errors. These errors can arise from issues such as human errors in data collection or problems with measurement equipment. Researchers must comprehend these causes to appropriately address outliers and minimize their impact on the analysis. Treating outliers effectively can greatly enhance data analysis by providing a more precise representation of underlying patterns and relationships. Removal or adjustment of extreme values enables researchers to obtain a clearer and more reliable picture of the phenomena under investigation, leading to crucial insights and facilitating further analyses and decision-making. Addressing outliers also offers opportunities for additional research and a deeper understanding of the underlying processes or factors at play. By extensively investigating the reasons behind outliers, researchers can gain valuable insights that can guide future research efforts and contribute to more informed decision-making based on the data. An exemplary illustration of the significance of accurate assessment techniques in statistical analyses is the OPC fineness study. This study analyzed the impact of various assessment methods on scoring results by comparing data from different laboratories using z-scores. The findings of this study demonstrated that the choice of assessment technique significantly influenced the scoring outcomes. Therefore, careful consideration of assessment procedures is crucial for obtaining reliable and comparable results in statistical analyses. In conclusion, outliers in data analysis present both challenges and opportunities for researchers. Accurately detecting and addressing outliers is essential for obtaining reliable and meaningful results. A comprehensive understanding of the causes of outliers, such as measurement and sampling errors, is necessary for appropriate treatment. Effectively treating outliers enhances the accuracy and validity of analysis and provides avenues for further research and informed decision-making. The OPC fineness study exemplifies the importance of assessment techniques in statistical analyses. A nuanced understanding of outlier detection and treatment is indispensable for drawing valid statistical conclusions.

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13
Page(s) 21-28
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Proficiency Testing, z-score, Statistical Techniques, Outliers, OPC

References
[1] ISO 5725-1: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions.
[2] ISO 5725-2: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 2: Basic methods for the repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method.
[3] ISO 5725-3: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 3: Intermediate measures of the precision of a standard measurement method.
[4] ISO 5725-4: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 4: Basic methods for the determination of the trueness of a standard measurement method.
[5] ISO 5725-5: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 5: Alternative methods for the determination of the precision of a standard measurement method.
[6] ISO 5725-6: 1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 6: Use in practice of accuracy values.
[7] ISO/TR 22971: 2005. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Practical guidance for the use of ISO 5725-2: 1994 in designing, implementing and statistically analysing inter-laboratory repeatability and reproducibility results.
[8] ISO/ІЕС 17043: 2010. Conformity assessment. – General requirements for proficiency testing.
[9] ISO 13528: 2015 Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter-laboratory comparison.
[10] ISO/IEC 17025: 2017, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
[11] IS 4031 (Part 11): 1988, Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement- Determination of Density.
[12] Manoj K, Senthamarai Kannan K. Comparison of methods for detecting outliers. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 9, September 2013.
[13] Tripathy, S. S. (2013) Comparison of statistical methods for outlier detection in proficiency testing data on analysis of lead in aqueous solution, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 2(6), 233.
[14] ASTM E691, Standard practice for conducting an inter-laboratory study to determine the precision of a test method.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Vashishtha, S. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Various Statistical Techniques Applied to Assess Participants' Laboratory Performance in an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Proficiency Testing Program. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 13(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Vashishtha, S. Comparative Analysis of the Various Statistical Techniques Applied to Assess Participants' Laboratory Performance in an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Proficiency Testing Program. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2024, 13(1), 21-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Vashishtha S. Comparative Analysis of the Various Statistical Techniques Applied to Assess Participants' Laboratory Performance in an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Proficiency Testing Program. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2024;13(1):21-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13,
      author = {Shwet Vashishtha},
      title = {Comparative Analysis of the Various Statistical Techniques Applied to Assess Participants' Laboratory Performance in an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Proficiency Testing Program},
      journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {21-28},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtas.20241301.13},
      abstract = {Outliers in data analysis pose both challenges and opportunities for researchers. On one hand, if not adequately addressed, outliers can distort statistical analyses and lead to flawed conclusions. Conversely, outliers can also offer valuable insights into underlying processes or factors at play. One commonly used method for identifying outliers is through the analysis of interquartile ranges (IQRs). By accurately detecting and treating these anomalies, researchers can ensure the accuracy and validity of their findings. The major causes of outliers in data analysis stem from measurement and sampling errors. These errors can arise from issues such as human errors in data collection or problems with measurement equipment. Researchers must comprehend these causes to appropriately address outliers and minimize their impact on the analysis. Treating outliers effectively can greatly enhance data analysis by providing a more precise representation of underlying patterns and relationships. Removal or adjustment of extreme values enables researchers to obtain a clearer and more reliable picture of the phenomena under investigation, leading to crucial insights and facilitating further analyses and decision-making. Addressing outliers also offers opportunities for additional research and a deeper understanding of the underlying processes or factors at play. By extensively investigating the reasons behind outliers, researchers can gain valuable insights that can guide future research efforts and contribute to more informed decision-making based on the data. An exemplary illustration of the significance of accurate assessment techniques in statistical analyses is the OPC fineness study. This study analyzed the impact of various assessment methods on scoring results by comparing data from different laboratories using z-scores. The findings of this study demonstrated that the choice of assessment technique significantly influenced the scoring outcomes. Therefore, careful consideration of assessment procedures is crucial for obtaining reliable and comparable results in statistical analyses. In conclusion, outliers in data analysis present both challenges and opportunities for researchers. Accurately detecting and addressing outliers is essential for obtaining reliable and meaningful results. A comprehensive understanding of the causes of outliers, such as measurement and sampling errors, is necessary for appropriate treatment. Effectively treating outliers enhances the accuracy and validity of analysis and provides avenues for further research and informed decision-making. The OPC fineness study exemplifies the importance of assessment techniques in statistical analyses. A nuanced understanding of outlier detection and treatment is indispensable for drawing valid statistical conclusions.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Comparative Analysis of the Various Statistical Techniques Applied to Assess Participants' Laboratory Performance in an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Proficiency Testing Program
    AU  - Shwet Vashishtha
    Y1  - 2024/03/07
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13
    T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    SP  - 21
    EP  - 28
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9006
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20241301.13
    AB  - Outliers in data analysis pose both challenges and opportunities for researchers. On one hand, if not adequately addressed, outliers can distort statistical analyses and lead to flawed conclusions. Conversely, outliers can also offer valuable insights into underlying processes or factors at play. One commonly used method for identifying outliers is through the analysis of interquartile ranges (IQRs). By accurately detecting and treating these anomalies, researchers can ensure the accuracy and validity of their findings. The major causes of outliers in data analysis stem from measurement and sampling errors. These errors can arise from issues such as human errors in data collection or problems with measurement equipment. Researchers must comprehend these causes to appropriately address outliers and minimize their impact on the analysis. Treating outliers effectively can greatly enhance data analysis by providing a more precise representation of underlying patterns and relationships. Removal or adjustment of extreme values enables researchers to obtain a clearer and more reliable picture of the phenomena under investigation, leading to crucial insights and facilitating further analyses and decision-making. Addressing outliers also offers opportunities for additional research and a deeper understanding of the underlying processes or factors at play. By extensively investigating the reasons behind outliers, researchers can gain valuable insights that can guide future research efforts and contribute to more informed decision-making based on the data. An exemplary illustration of the significance of accurate assessment techniques in statistical analyses is the OPC fineness study. This study analyzed the impact of various assessment methods on scoring results by comparing data from different laboratories using z-scores. The findings of this study demonstrated that the choice of assessment technique significantly influenced the scoring outcomes. Therefore, careful consideration of assessment procedures is crucial for obtaining reliable and comparable results in statistical analyses. In conclusion, outliers in data analysis present both challenges and opportunities for researchers. Accurately detecting and addressing outliers is essential for obtaining reliable and meaningful results. A comprehensive understanding of the causes of outliers, such as measurement and sampling errors, is necessary for appropriate treatment. Effectively treating outliers enhances the accuracy and validity of analysis and provides avenues for further research and informed decision-making. The OPC fineness study exemplifies the importance of assessment techniques in statistical analyses. A nuanced understanding of outlier detection and treatment is indispensable for drawing valid statistical conclusions.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • R. P. P. T. Laboratory, National Test House (NR), Ghaziabad, India

  • Sections